Intellectual property rights is not instead of themselves

Two days, on the United States to pressure China on intellectual property issues reports sparked concern. U.S. accuses China of intellectual property rights violations is still serious, and should take responsibility on the U.S. trade deficit.

But the blame is not all. U.S. State Department Bureau of International Information published in the June 9 "American Reference" in the report on the matter revealed that some members of Congress on the status quo of China's intellectual property rights of the claim to be a "good" opinions. U.S. Department of Commerce International Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator Yisileier (Chris Israel) said the Chinese government set up around the country reporting centers in 50 IP infringement. He said: "We hope these reports center effectively." He also mentioned the successful owner of several intellectual property cases, and, accordingly, said, "We imitation and piracy continues to conduct extensive cooperation with the Chinese government."

While another charge of China affairs, Stratford, Assistant U.S. Trade Representative (Timothy Stratford) said that China has a lot of counterfeit products, "such as pharmaceuticals, batteries, automotive parts, industrial equipment and toys to the United States, consumers in China and other countries pose a direct threat to the health and safety. "

Treatment of intellectual property rights, the Chinese Government's attitude has always been active and effective. Moreover, China's IPR protection has been progress.

But we are firmly opposed to protectionism in the U.S. business, including intellectual property rights in the name of any form of protectionism and "aggression."

In fact, these two attitudes is difficult to water is water, oil is the oil to distinguish. In most cases, their boundaries are more blurred.

The face of U.S. criticism, people's attitudes were mixed. On the one hand, we hate the way Americans find fault; the other hand, our own intellectual property protection on its limitations.

Two recent events even more food for thought: First Chinese tourists to wear fake brand-name clothing in Europe was fined; second place in Hunan fake bus incident.

The former feels shame, which makes chilling. In the fake bus incident, a factory in Hunan to produce counterfeit bus for a living, things are revealed, judicial investigation has encountered difficulties. Face interview with China Central Television, the judiciary said that since the beginning of this project is the city to attract foreign investment project, the city led to the investigation is extremely "cautious."

In saying this, while those fake brands converted buses are on the road speeding, safety of visitors simply can not be guaranteed.

The United States to put pressure on China is of course the interest from it will not be good to have no benefit others instead of themselves level. However, for their own people, some of our local government and law enforcement agencies are doing enough on it?

Construction and protection of intellectual property rights, we do not need to do for whom. It is not instead of themselves, but for ourselves. The driving force was not sufficient it?






Recommended links:



e-cology in the Pan Micro Series 39: 24 hour online training center



Runners grab the East HOME



Top Registry Tools



Tomato Garden in France, Italy and public OPINION



ASF to MPG



Evaluate Games Board



MSN Also Has "never Gone" Fixed Base



rm to mpeg4/avc free trial



OGM to AVI



From "Made in China" to "Created in China"



DivX To IPod



PIMS And Calendars REPORT



The Economic Observer: Why choose Hong Kong-listed Alibaba



P2P popular series of four



COMPILATION of various source - frespace